I'm especially annoyed by teachers who think this is an alternative to actually spending one on one time with their students individualizing what they actually teach to their students. This is not what education is about, or HOW it should be delivered. This is completely unethical considering the population it is aimed at. The developers of this software have done a good song and dance to convince local Boards of education to purchase the software. The concept of killing monsters is also not appropriate in the context of teaching young minds anything, including math. Playing to kids to put money out for their education is rather guilt laden for parents. The music is too loud, rushed in nature and too 'dark' for young children, Very quickly into the program, kids (parents) are asked to purchased memberships which are very EXPENSIVE and totally inappropriate for a public school system to be recommending to parents. My daughter has no prior knowledge teaching of most of the concepts which makes the questions only frustrating and a review of my properly one on one taught math instruction. Manyu of the math concepts are excessively beyond the grade 2 curriculum and there is absolutely no type of 'teaching' going on. This program was recommended by my daughter's grade 2 teacher. I'm a teacher and a Psychological consultant for the public school system. I think this software program is just awful for so many reasons. Which Side of History? How Technology Is Reshaping Democracy and Our Lives.Cómo saber si una aplicación o sitio web son realmente educativos.How to Tell If an App or a Website Is Good for Learning.Teachers: Find the best edtech tools for your classroom with in-depth expert reviews.

Check out new Common Sense Selections for games.10 tips for getting kids hooked on books.Common Sense Selections for family entertainment.

Play prodigy